Can an employer propose benefits to special personnel simply?
My best friend has worked at her company for the closing 7 years. Her employer has other offered benefits. Her employer would now close to to offer benefits to special employees with the sole purpose, in direct to cut costs.
The company is located in FL and have 40 +/- employees.
I know this is not moral, but is it legally recognized?
Answers:
nope they have to proposal her benefits..is she full time/part time weeks only..
Morality have nothing to do near wether or not certain human resources should be offered certain benefits when others are not... connotation that the higher producing organization are more necessary for the servival of the business and so harder to keep, so extra benefits possibly needed in instruct to keep or attract a difficult educated, or more qualified individual, but within most states it is legal. There are convinced benefits that are known as carveout plans that an employer can net specific qualifications for the benefits to be offered to specific human resources.
You would have to consult someone who is within your state, or your friends state as to the legality of the issue. But if your friend is concerned near not getting the added benefits, she should find out what the qualifications are, and if the benefits are really that noteworthy to her, go out and attain those qualifications to return with the added benefits.
They have to bump into certain requirements to receive it.
As long as the company offer benefits to all force of one CLASS, they can do it. Example: You can offer benefits to ONLY "class a" team but not "class b", and YOU define which class an member of staff belongs to (you have to pre-define the classes). YOu can set aside benefits to ONLY board members, or ONLY officer, or ONLY salaried people (as dead set against hourly).
So it can be done. And it STINKS that they're doing it. I'd suggest that in establish to cut costs, they contribute more to certain classes, and smaller amount to others, while still making the coverage AVAILABLE to everyone.
Employers may offer benefits to solitary certain team as long as they define the class of workforce to be covered and then cover adjectives of those employees. For example, they could explain the class by job classification (for example, owners and manager only or salaried organization only) or by tenure (employees with "x" or more years of service) or by hours worked (employees working "x" or more hours per week) or by other medium. As long as they are creating a specifically defined class, it's legal and OK underneath ERISA law.
It's a pity that your friend's employer must do this to cut cost - I would be concerned that the business isn't doing well and that this might be the first of frequent cost saving cuts to come.
I cant see why its not legitimate. The CEO of boeing has his own Jet that he get to fly anywhere he wants. The janitor of the company doesnt even take to look at the plane.
Benefits are considered by most companies part of your take-home pay, the more you are paid the better benefits you catch.
Employeer says okay im giving the top individuals dental insurance but nobody else. Its perfectly official.